Virtual Society? logo

HomeSearchOverviewWhoProjectsReportsEventsJoinResources


Virtual Society? Get Real!
Paper abstracts

Stream 3 - Citizenship

Dematerializing French Bureaucracy: (Ethno)graphic tales of cryptology in the field by Jean-François Blanchette
Cyber-democracy and public participation in spatial environmental decision-making by Steve Carver
Little Brothers: Fear and Secrecy in Cyberia by Jodi Dean
The Impact of Private Sex Sites on the Web by Nicola Döring
BRIDGING THE GAP - Bringing the Information Society into citizens' everyday life by Ari Heinonen
Virtual Hype? New Media and the Transformation of Political Parties and Party Systems by Ivan Horrocks
Confronting Electronic Surveillance: Desiring and Resisting New Technologies by Brian McGrail
Negotiating Privacy in a Changing Environment (provisional title) by Charles D. Raab
Russia: from NGO's Networks to Community's Networks by Sergei Stafeev

 


Dematerializing French bureaucracy: (Ethno)graphic tales of cryptology in the field
Jean-François Blanchette, STS, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and CECOJI, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Jean-Francois.Blanchette@ivry.cnrs.fr

For much of its history, cryptology occupied a limited growth but highly stable niche market: protecting diplomatic and military communications. In the last decade however, the phenomenal growth of the Internet --- along with its perceived insecurity --- has transformed a relatively obscure and esoteric science into a key link to the promises of the New Economy: as the current wisdom goes, e-commerce will not flourish until the public gains sufficient confidence that electronic transactions are secure. "Security", in this context, is generally equated with the ability to exchange information confidentially (e.g. credit card numbers), using cryptology-based technologies. Yet, the main impact of cryptology might not lie so much in its ability to provide confidentiality to the masses, but rather in the way it has come to define authenticity of electronic transactions (identification of parties + non-repudiation) and its technological realization in the electronic world (public-key infrastructures).

In the world of paper-and-ink documents, the practices by which authenticity is enacted and sustained over time resists simple reduction to algorithmical processes. In France, for example, "authenticity" refers to a precise legal concept, as defined by article 1317 of the Napoleonic civil code: "the authentic [legal] act is that one which has been received with the required solemnity by public officers..." Authenticity is thus at once a professional privilege (for the most part, that of notaries), the outcome of a ritual with carefully prescribed forms, an economical interest (French law requires that certain documents, such as wills, be made authentic), as well as a specific location in the hierarchy of proof law (in trials, authentic documents cannot be opposed by mere testimony). The sometimes ancient practices of paper-and-ink authenticity and the sparkling new technologies of electronic authentication were called to settle their differences when, in the fall of 1999, the French government announced a public consultation over the proper legislative framework to guide France's entry into the Information Age. The first piece of legislation to come out of this process has been an electronic signature bill, adopted on February 29; amending articles 1316, 1317, and 1326 of the civil code, it defines the concept of signature (electronic or otherwise), and introduces the notion of an electronic authentic act.

Based on ongoing fieldwork conducted since September 1999 among French legal scholars, notaries, legislators, standard setting bodies and cryptologists, this paper documents the meeting of these two notions of authenticity. In the first part, I outline how cryptology, from a professional concern originally centered on confidentiality, came to invest the field of authenticity; secondly, I review the legislative work leading to the French electronic signature law, from UNCITRAL working groups, to OECD expert committees, to European Parliament directives, to theoretical reflections of French legal scholars; in the third part, I describe how the French notaries have strategized around the advent of the electronic authentic act, as a potentially fundamental reorganization of their professional activity. Emerging from this fieldwork is a picture of authenticity as a contested category, at once legal qualification, technological process, professional identity, civic institution, and political symbolic device. Such research suggests the promise of critical examination of computer security, beyond exclusive fascination with individual privacy, national security, and hacker culture.

Full paper

Return to top of page

Cyber-democracy and public participation in spatial environmental decision-making
Steve Carver, Andrew Evans, Richard Kingston and Ian Turton (University of Leeds)

Traditional methods of public participation in environmental decision making have tended to focus on local authority planning meetings. This is often in an atmosphere of ‘them and us’ with the authoritative decision-makers holding all the knowledge, expertise and information. It is often the case in these more traditional settings that a vocal minority (activists) dominate the public’s viewpoint with many people who may have equally if not more valid points to make, resisting from expressing their concerns, opinions and viewpoints (Healey et.al., 1988). It is suggested that the use of the World Wide Web (WWW) in such situations has the potential to break down the barriers to participation by taking away certain psychological elements which the public often face when expressing their points of view at public meetings. As Graham (1996, p.2) argues, the Internet will "generate a new public sphere supporting interaction, debate, new forms of democracy and ‘cyber cultures’ which feed back to support a renaissance in the social and cultural life of cities".

Many environmental decision-making problems have at the core of them a very important spatial element and can often be best represented with what is called a Geographical Information System (GIS). This paper will explore the ways in which GIS and the WWW can be used to provide the general public with a mechanism for becoming more involved in local environmental decision-making problems. By providing full access to spatial and aspatial data along with the appropriate technology, which is usually only available to local decision-making bodies, the general public can potentially become increasingly capable of accessing, browsing and manipulating such data. This gives the public the potential to have greater involvement in the decisions that affect them at the local, regional and national scale. While in the past GIS have been accused of being an elitist technology giving more power to those already possessing it and depriving those, generally the public, who more often than not lack such access (Pickles, 1995; Monmonier, 1996) a publicly accessible GIS could overcome this criticism.

It could be argued that this increase in participation is contradicted by the lack of access which the public have to the Internet. Current estimates of public Internet access vary from source to source but it is becoming apparent that over the next decade access will continue to grow becoming as widely used as other electronic gadgets. Access is also increasingly being made available through open access points in public places such as libraries, community centres and council buildings, as well as schools and businesses giving ever widening opportunities to get on-line. Further issues surrounding the empowerment of the public and how they may interpret and use GIS type tools on the WWW are also explored. Monmonier (1996) argues that giving the public access to GIS technology can put them in a vulnerable position. He argues that the public "armed with a GIS but lacking the savvy to use the systems appropriately become vulnerable to sarcastic attacks from site advocates". We would argue that providing public access to GIS empowers the public in a positive way. Examples in the USA in several communities has returned positive results from all sides of the decision-making processes. In the UK increasing numbers of community based organisation are taking on board local decision-makers as public involvement in what takes place within their own communities becomes ever more important.

These issues are exemplified through the discussion of two case study examples at the local and regional scale of spatial planning. The methodology and results of these case studies provides a platform with which to develop new theory and methodology relating to the use and implementation of public participation GIS on the WWW as an aid to spatial environmental decision making. This paper argues that providing open access to particular decision-making problems over the WWW will play an increasing role in the way future spatial environmental proposals and decisions are made. The practical development and testing of these systems will help direct the future of public participation in environmental decision-making by using GIS on the WWW.

References

Graham, S.D.N. (1996) Flight to the Cyber Suburbs. The Guardian, April 18, pp.2-3.
Healey, P., McNamara, P., Elson, M., and Doak, A. (1988) Land Use Planning and the Mediation of Urban Change. Cambridge University Press.
Monmonier, M. (1996) Ridicule as a Weapon Against GIS-Based Siting Studies. http://www.geo.wvu.edu/i19/papers/monmonier.html
Pickles, J. (1995) (Ed.) Ground Truth: the social implications of geographical information systems. Guildford Press: New York.

Full paper

Return to top of page

Little Brothers: Fear and Secrecy in Cyberia
Jodi Dean, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva, New York, JDean@HWS.EDU

1984 came and went and Big Brother is still not watching. But Little Brothers are. Surveilling our transactions and disseminating our secrets, a network of Little Brothers trades in information. They have access, data, Intranets, and billion-dollar capitalizations. Although they lack Big Brother's state power, the Little Brothers thrive in the excesses of the information economy. Radiating a sense of the new, the now, the bleeding edge, they promise freedom, prosperity, and democracy. With slogans like "we're all connected" and "information wants to be free," the Little Brothers represent themselves as all of us, for all of us. In contemporary global technoculture, however, some of us are more connected than others.

 In this paper I ask: Why, given evocations of democratic access and freely circulating information, have the disruptions brought about by new communication technologies failed to provide significant new opportunities for resistance and emancipation? Indeed, rather than producing informed activist subjects, the nonstop flow of information and entertainment contributes to subjectivities oriented around the event, choice, perfection, and fear. And, it contributes to subjectivities ill-positioned either to question the ever-consolidating wealth and influence of multinational corporations or to resist the ever-increasing deluge of commodities and consumer entertainments (even when, especially when, they lack the money to purchase them). To think about how this happened, I look to the rise of the Little Brothers and the demise of Big Brother/the Big Other. Here I analyse the Apple commercial, "1984." I then link this answer into a genealogy of personal and networked computing. My answer involves the ways in which the democratic ideal of publicity, of accessibility and inclusivity, came to legitimise the new economy.

 There's a powerful ambiguity in Apple's evocation of Big Brother: he's more than IBM; he's the state. The attack on Big Brother is an attack on a particular mode of state power, one associated with the centralised, technologised, control of mainframes, with a capacity to dominate the production and dissemination of information, and with a monopoly on the secret and arcane knowledges associated with computers, codes, and cybernetics. Through this attack, Apple reappropriates the critique of technology so prominent in the 1960s and early 1970s. The Frankfurt School's critique of instrumental reason, the attack on technique and bureaucracy found in French theorists such as Jacques Ellul and Jean Meynaud, and the specter of a technology-driven wasteland in the work of Theodore Roszak all challenged the vision of post-war, mainframed, efficiency-minded planning by experts. In the Apple commercial, itself part of a larger change going on in the computing industry, technology provides the solution to problems of technology.

 As I explain, a number of conceptual shifts enabled this move: from orchestration to interconnection, from invisibility to the fetishistic visibility of technological processes, from the claim that technology solves (or causes) all social problems to the claim that information solves (or causes) all social problems, from the critical employment of play against technology-driven work to the legitimation of computer networking via the construction of work as play and play as work, from the association of computers with rationalisation, centralisation, and expertise to their association with creativity, decentralisation, and amateurism. The critique of technocratic control's representation of computers as a secret technology of mainframes administered by an esoteric, hierarchical, unapproachable elite was countered by a vision of the personal computer as a tool of democratic publicity, a vision that, as it remained contrary to market realities of the computer in the 1970s, had itself to be heavily promoted and publicised.

Precisely because the selling of the information age employed the reassuring dynamic of publicity against secrecy, the critique of technocracy is dropped rather than engaged. Instead of corporations coming to occupy the place that government occupied in the age of the mainframe, they become the vehicle for democracy, now figured in terms of the access enabled by expensive computers and consumer electronics.

Full paper

Return to top of page

The Impact of Private Sex Sites on the Web
Nicola Döring, University of Heidelberg, Psychology Department, Nicola.Doering@urz.uni-heidelberg.de

There are many sex sites on the web that sell erotic or pornographic material. But there are also many non-commercial sex sites offering sexually explicit content for free. Not a lot of money, skill or equipment is necessary to do web-publishing. In addition, it can be done anonymously or pseudonymously if so desired. Instead of just consuming or avoiding the ordinary male-oriented mainstream material, the Net provides us with the opportunity to actively participate in sexual discourses by sharing - via a private web-site - our own sexual experiences, preferences and fantasies with a larger audience. It is often claimed that the DIY or grassroots publishing that is possible on-line fosters emancipation and democratisation through empowering marginalized individuals and groups. However, we can hardly expect on-line publication to lead to some kind of sexual revolution because empowerment is not caused by the Net itself. Instead, empowerment comes through the determined and effective usage of the Net, which demands an effort not everyone is able or motivated to make. Does that mean private sex sites - far from being revolutionary - represent just one more outlet for sex-seeking males? Do these sites not adhere to traditional heterosexist gender roles – often even propagating especially violent images that would be unacceptable offline? Although not all web publishers who are socialized within the androcentric western culture try to resist or criticize heterosexist influences by means of their own web sites, some do just that. While mass media depend on their contents' marketability and therefore neglect alternative views, private web sites can cover all kinds of topics regardless of the existence or size of a paying audience.

So what kind of content do we find on private sex sites? What intra- and interpersonal consequences does maintaining a personal sex site have for the site’s owners? How are private sex sites used and evaluated by the site visitors? These general questions were addressed in three separate explorative studies: a content analysis of n=300 private sex sites, a survey of n=40 site owners, and a survey of n=100 site visitors. The results of the studies confirmed the expectation that private sex sites can neither be claimed to be revolutionary nor reactionary, but that they cover a broad spectrum of views ranging from traditional to subversive, from harmless to potentially dangerous, from clear cut to obscure. It turns out that private sex sites not only are used to deliver content but also are a means of invoking discourses and building personal relationships. All site owners reported receiving meaningful feedback in response to their web sites, and most entered in online conversations and let people in their offline environments know about their online activities. All site owners made it clear that sexual expression on the net was not a substitute but rather a reflection and extension of their general sex-related activities. Going online and public with private sex sites has nothing to do with virtualisation, on the contrary it stresses the realness of our hidden desires.

Return to top of page

BRIDGING THE GAP - Bringing the Information Society into citizens' everyday life
Ari Heinonen, Dept. of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Tampere, Finland, ari.a.heinonen@uta.fi

This presentation introduces a research and development project currently underway at the University of Tampere. Entitled "Locality in the Global Net", the project is aimed at bridging the gap between Information Society rhetorics and citizens' everyday life.

The purpose of the project is to generate and study local forms and contents of journalism and citizen communication by using new communication technologies, especially the Internet. The method adopted is that of participatory development and research: the project provides guidance and support to local communities in their efforts to create and maintain their own websites, at the same time extracting research data from these processes. Essential in the approach is the recognition that the communication features of community websites should reflect the interests of local citizens.

The project is organised around a portal website called Mansetori where the focus is on the city of Tampere, and an affiliated sub-site in the city of Oulu. The sub-sites represent various types of local communication spheres, enabling a comprehensive study. An important feature is that the different spheres are aware of one another together constituting a larger local communication space.

In line with this, the project's activities are divided into three categories with the corresponding sub-sites under the main portal site:

Preliminary observations of the project show that technology as such is not a sufficient condition for citizens' information society:

Full paper

Return to top of page

Virtual Hype? New Media and the Transformation of Political Parties and Party Systems
Ivan Horrocks, Leicester University and Dominic Wring, Loughborough University, Ijhorrocks@aol.com

he proposition that the so-called 'new' media pose both opportunities and threats for democracy has a relatively long and well-established history. On the one hand, they offer the promise of an information rich society in which citizens have access to a wide range of materials from a variety of sources. In this scenario every issue is extensively debated amongst the public and policy makers through interactive media. Participation in the political process is thus greatly increased. On the other hand, the same 'new' media may threaten to undermine democracy. They may do this by compounding existing biases in the distribution of knowledge and information; by fragmenting discourse between increasingly differentiated policy areas; and by reducing participation to a distanced and marginalised vote that occurs as a ‘knee-jerk’ reaction to a limited number of 'soundbite' options.

Despite, and perhaps because of, the ambiguous yet profound consequences for democracy that accompany the ongoing development of new media, interest in exploiting these technologies for democratic purposes has continued to flourish. And it is clear that the continuous, rapid advances in the capacities and capabilities of the new media that have been witnessed over the last decade, combined with concern over the apparent crisis of political legitimacy throughout the developed world, has further heightened interest in electronic democracy.

The crises of democracy thesis, and its specific concern with political participation, has several important dimensions. One of the most fundamental relates to the apparent decline of the political party. It is the role that new media technologies have played and may play in reinventing this particular feature of democracies that is the focus of this paper. However, before examining the relationship between the new media and political parties the paper seeks to explore a number of crucial questions: What is it about the so-called ‘new’ media that is new and constitutes a break with the past? What distinguishes these forms of technology from previous developments in information and communication technologies? And will their impact be felt equally throughout the polity or be more pronounced within certain arenas and/or specific sets of political relationships?

Having addressed these questions and explored the emergence and impact of electronic democracy it will be argued that the new media should not always be construed as a radical departure with previous practices. More profitably, they can be viewed as representing the latest in a long line of technological developments that have been utilised by political parties in order to improve their effectiveness and efficiency. In addition to this, claims about the supposedly democratic properties of the new media need to be treated with a great deal of caution. For, as will be demonstrated, opportunities are accompanied by a range of threats associated primarily with centralisation, exclusion and control.

Return to top of page

Confronting Electronic Surveillance: Desiring and Resisting New Technologies
Brian McGrail (Open University)

The recent pervasion of 'new electronic technologies' throughout society has given some observers cause for celebration but enduced in others a sense of alarm. On the one hand, the extension of CCTV – the most notable form of electronic surveillance – into numerous public/private spaces is bringing into question the future of civic life, especially when there appears to be a lack of popular resistance to such schemes. On the other, electronic surveillance is viewed, not as a threat to freedom, but as a means

of protecting the rights of more vulnerable sections of the community to use and control space. Further still, new methods of surveillance are seen as a prerequisite to improved social care in a society with rising numbers of single-person households. Drawing on in-depth interviews across 10 case study housing estates this chapter attempts to short circuit a number of these debates by focusing on the actual conditions of production and reproduction of CCTV as a social technology.

Return to top of page

Negotiating Privacy in a Changing Environment
Charles D. Raab (University of Edinburgh)

New developments in law, technology, government policy and business practice have posed a severe challenge to conventional assumptions about information privacy and its protection. The increasing globalisation of information flows have added a new dimension to the dilemmas of finding appropriate and effective regulatory strategies and systems at a variety of jurisdictional levels and in diverse organisational contexts. The guidance provided by the legacy of privacy protection since the 1970s is a diminishing resource, yet policy actors and others grope to devise new ways in a highly uncertain environment in which the value of privacy itself is contested.

Based on research into these issues, this paper examines developments and the problems as well as the opportunities they create for privacy protection. It uses documentary and interview material to highlight and consider critically, in different domains of data-usage, the uncertain relationship among several intertwining instruments: These include legal provisions (and their redevelopment and enforcement at several levels), an emerging preferred option of organisational self-regulation, the deployment of technologies themselves - once seen as 'the problem' - as the 'solution', and market 'choices' made available to individuals concerning their own privacy.

Full paper

Return to top of page

Russia: from NGO's Networks to Community's Networks
Sergei Stafeev, gard@gard.spb.org

NGOs have a vital role in the development of a democratic society. Russian society is in transformation from Communism to an open democratic society. NGOs have blossomed throughout the region in response to the changes in society. Their health and fitness is crucial in the process of transformation. Analysts and experts attest that NGOs remain at a primitive stage. Most have developed in response to local communities needs, but do not have the capacity to play their full role in transforming Russia into an open democratic society.

There are more than 10000 NGOs in St.-Petersburg and Leningrad region that are working in the different fields such as environment, social help, women's movement, preservation of national cultures and many others. Some carry out project work on the ground, others focus on public relations and media campaigns whilst others scrutinize internal functions of organisations. Until the recent time the organisations of "the third sector" of this region have existed in an " information vacuum ", often not knowing that similar organisations exist. The development of democratic processes in Russia has brought about an increased need for receiving and exchanging information. This is especially important for both new commercial and non-commercial sectors.

Development of ICTs (especially Internet) giving the new principal possibilities for Russian's nonprofit sector. The Internet offers NGOs an opportunity to learn more about civil society and NGOs in particular in other parts of the world. Importantly, it offers the chance to establish active co-operation between like organisations. Thanks to the new informational technologies, Russian NGO can increase the critical mass of political actions against human rights violations or environmental destruction, by sending electronic 'alerts' to the world. The Internet also supports the quick exchange of vital information between local NGOs and their colleagues in other countries and so on. At the same time, on the local level, some of the active local NGOs could be the basic organizations for creation of informational municipal (community) networks which allow to have free Internet access for users which not readily accessible through private sector channels.

Russian NGOs today face demands to scale up development programs, increase their effectiveness and accountability, and expand cooperative activities with government, business, and other civil society organizations. The greater the capacity of our NGOs to involve target groups in civil dialogue, the better able are businesses and local authorities to make their contribution to sustainable development. In Russia nonprofit sector identify our communities' needs and make them places to live and work. That is why we consider that at the NGO base will be developed informational Community networks in Russia t and the future of informational Community networks in Russia exactly in development of local NGO's networks. Creation on the base of active local NGOs new organization structures (Networks, partnerships, coalitions etc) with participation of majority local social structures (small business, mass-media, NGO, local govts etc) should be a good sustanaible base for creation community informational networks in Russia and their empowerment in international projects in the field of community networking.

The network should give the equal possibilities for the residents of this territory for the ICTs access and for the ability to set their own information at the community’s web-server.

The socio-cultural aspects of this problem will be considered too. How the informational Communities will be formed in Russia, how the reinforcement of NGO role will promote to sustainable development and democratization at the post-Soviet territory.

Russia is slowly walking along the path of ICT uses for social and civic purposes. Not going into details we want to note that the main reason is insufficient financing of the federal programs of non-profit informational nets development . In these conditions a large amount of people with low income lack the possibility of access to new possibilities which are granted by modern ICTs.

Return to top of page

Conference Overview
Conference Programme
Conference pictures

HomeSearchOverviewWhoProjectsReportsEventsJoinResources

Return to top of page
Switch to text only version

Page developed by Christine Hine
Page maintained by Marike van Harskamp
Contents current at 28th June 2000